||Site access||Mobile apps||Resources||Site map|
|Contents|||||Archaic markers|||||Metrical patterns|||||Division study|||||Reconstruction|
This page explores the various ways critics have divided up the block structure of this song. Sources are:
The colour scheme is intended more to visually separate blocks within a vertical line and the individual colours do not necessarily indicate a particular interpretation of the verse(s) involved. By hovering the mouse pointer over a block a fuller description will be seen, eg Muilenberg's HC of verses 2 and 3 is abbreviated from "Hymnic Confession". These descriptions are repeated at the end of the page. Some interpretation of the different divisions is offered at the foot of the table. Each original source contains much more explanation and supporting argument, and should be consulted for more detail.
Sing will I to Yahweh,
for he has excelled exalted!
Horse and his charioteer
he threw into the sea.
‘âzzîy wezimrâth yâh
My strength and my music of praise is Yahweh:
he is to me my salvation.
zeh ’êlîy we’anewêhû
’elôhêy ’âbîy wa’arômemenhû
This is my El, who I place at my heart,
Elohim of my father - I set Him on high.
YHVH ’îysh milchâmâh
Yahweh is a man of war!
Yahweh is His name!
markebôth par‘ôh wechêylôw
The chariots of Pharaoh's force
he cast into the sea,
and the best of his commanders
have sunk into Yam Suph.
yâredû bimetsôwlôth kemôw-’âben
The deeps have spread over them,
they dropped into the depths like stone.
Your right hand O Yahweh -
majestic in power!
Your right hand O Yahweh -
it shattered the enemy!
In your great exaltation
you throw down your rivals,
unleash your burning anger
and consume them like chaff.
nitstsebû kemôw-nêd nôzelîym
qâphe’û tehômôth beleb-yam
In the breath of your anger
heaped up the waters -
standing still like a stack the stream,
curdled deeps in the heart of the sea.
Said the foe
“I chase, I catch -
divide the spoil
fill up my soul -
I draw my sword,
I ruin him with my right hand!”
You blew with your breath,
spread over them the sea,
they submerged like lead
in the waters of majesty.
mîy-kâmôkâh bâ’êlim YHVH
mîy kâmôkâh ne’dâr baqqôdesh
nôwrâ’ tehillôth ‘ôsêh-phele’
Who like you among the gods? Yahweh!
Who like you? Majestic in holiness,
astounding in praises, working wonder!
You reached out your right hand,
engulfed they were by earth.
You guide in your kindness
these kinfolk you adopted,
you lead in your strength
to your hearthplace of holiness.
shâme‘û ‘ammîym yiregâzûn
chîyl ’âchaz yôshebêy pelâshêth
They have heard and the nations are shaken:
anguish grips the dwellers of Pelasheth -
nâmôgû kôl yôshebêy kenâ‘an
the leaders of Edom,
the chieftains of Mo'ab
seized by trembling -
melted away all the dwellers of Cana'an.
Fallen upon them
are terror and dread!
At the greatness of your arm
they are struck silent like stone
‘ad-ya‘abôr ‘ammekâ YHVH
‘ad-ya‘abôr ‘am-zû qânîythâ
while they pass by - your kindred, Yahweh -
while they pass by - these kinfolk you have acquired.
You gather them in and root them
on the mountain of your estate,
the foundation of your dwelling
that you made, Yahweh,
the holy place, Yahweh,
founded by your hands.
It is Yahweh who will reign
always and for ever!
kîy bâ’ çûç par‘ôh
berikhebôw ûbephârâshâyw bayyâm
So went the horse of Pharaoh -
with his chariotry and with his riders - into the sea,
‘alêhem ’eth-mêy hayyâm
and Yahweh brought back
on them the waters of the sea,
but the children of Yisra'el
went on the dried-up land
in the middle of the sea.
wattiqqach miryâm hannebîy’âh
wattêtse’n kol-hannâshîym ’achareyhâ
Then took Miryam the prophetess,
sister of Aharon,
the timbrel in her hand,
and followed all the women after her
with timbrels and the dance,
watta‘an lâhem miryâm
and she celebrated for them, Miryam:
Sing you all to Yahweh,
for he has excelled exalted!
Horse and his charioteer
he threw into the sea.
Muilenberg's interpretation (column A) is built around the recognition of three thematic blocks - verses 2-6, 7-11 and 12-16. Each block is in turn divided into three - a "hymnic confession" of the focal theme, an "epic narrative" description, and a "hymnic response". The response he sees as plausibly used in a cultic ceremonial presentation of the event, or in some cases as a battle-shout. The whole is then enveloped between an "introit" at the start, and a "hymnic celebration" + "coda" at the end. His main analytic tools are the style of each block (hence confession, response etc) and the use of key thematic words to demark sections and establish connections between similar sections in different thematic blocks. For example, "like stone" closes both epic narrative sections of the first and third blocks, and "like lead" is close to the end of the middle one. He notes that the divine name Yahweh is not used in the "epic narrative" portions. Along with most other authors, he notes that the third thematic block contains more stylistic and structural divergences than the other two. Some commentators have seen this, along with the differing subject-matter of "the road ahead" rather than "the victory behind", as indicating that this block was added rather later. Muilenberg, however, feels that the coherence of patterning and expressions support a unified composition more strongly. He notes, though does not develop, metrical patterns and the implied connection with Ugaritic poetry.
Columns B and C - the collaborative work of Cross and Freedman, and the later development of this by Cross, focus heavily on metrical considerations, almost to the exclusion of other issues. This led them originally to exclude verse 2 in its entirety as a later insertion (on the basis that the metrical pattern was uncharacteristic of the whole), though Freedman later was happy to accept the second half of the verse. One of their primary interests was to seek to reconstruct the consonantal text appropriate to a composition date of the 12th century BCE, and this line of investigation has tended to obscure other textual features. For example, most commentators (including Cross himself in his later work) have recognised the different character of verses 6, 11, 16b and 18, and have noted them as separate divisions. However, this work has incorporated all of these verses simply as portions of larger units - often though not always at the beginning or end of such units - on the basis of the metrical pattern rather than the meaning or literary purpose. Both sources see a basic division of the Song into two parts - the first dealing with the immediate victory achieved by Yahweh at Yam Çuph, and the second looking towards the nations ahead. Within the two blocks, sub-divisions are recognised. In the collaborative work the boundaries of these sub-division were by and large identified by longer metrical lines - groups of 3:3 instead or 2:2 in terms of syllables of the reconstructed text - although this pattern breaks down at the end of I:3. If the same patterning was used, I:3 in Cross and Freedman's scheme would finish part-way through verse 11, though they in fact complete it after verse 12. In Cross's later work building on this, he retained the same two-fold structure but felt that sub-divisions should always follow metrical divisions rather than including mixed portions, thus leading to more sub-divisions. With the reinstatement of v2b, this means that each sub-division ends with two or three lines of 3 syllables rather than 2. This leaves the short section I:5 rather isolated, an issue which Cross does not attempt to explain. His division between II:4 and II:5 is also unclear.
Freedman's work, column D, sought to include other patterning schemes such as counting stresses rather than just syllables, and also shows a welcome return to recognising the importance of the meanings and literary significance of the phrases. While still following the basic division of the Song into two halves, he is happy to also acknowledge the existence of envelope portions before and after the main material. Hence his labelling of verses 1-4 as preparation, and 17 and 18 as concluding sections. He also marks out as refrains the three Yahweh-focused verses before his first strophe, between the two, and after the second one - the verses Muilenberg called "hymnic responses". Each of the two strophes is sub-divided into two sections, with the metrically longer verses forming the break-markers.
Fokkelman's work, column E, represents part of a systematic study of Hebrew poetics at multiple levels. The basic principle is that numerical patterns are important as a regular patterning scheme at syllable, word, colon, strophe and stanza levels. The scheme does not require exact consistency of numbers at each of these levels, but notes that there is a strong trend towards regularity.
My own interpretation seeks to explore the larger structures first, and is set in the context of a much larger investigation into Hebrew and Egyptian triumphal literature. The whole is reported elsewhere. The basic observation is that the work of art as a whole is constructed chiastically - not just the overtly poetic parts, but also including verses 19 and 20, normally translated as prose - in other words symmetrically in concentric blocks around a central pivot. The blocks are separated by (generally) shorter divisions, and as a rule the name Yahweh appears only in the divisions, not the blocks. As noted by several others, the pattern becomes more degraded in the later parts of the Song. From outside to inside, the concentric rings are:
In the longer sections C, C’, note that in each case a threefold subdivision of the material can be seen - the first part is a description of Yahweh's action (past or prospective), the second is a glimpse into the enemy's viewpoint (boastful in the past, fearful in the future), and the third describes Yahweh's response.
The large-scale structure is modelled on that of the Merenptah Stele, in which chiasmus is again used. The concentric blocks there celebrate the Pharaoh Merenptah's military prowess and royal qualities, and the divisions between most of the blocks are signalled by uses of the pharaonic titulary, written in cartouche form. These, the formal designations of the semi-divine pharaoh, are replaced in the structure of the Song of the Sea by lines using the divine name Yahweh. The central phrase of the Merenptah Stele is “A great wonder has fallen to Egypt”. The long blocks either side of that (corresponding to the blocks C, C’ above) also have a threefold internal structure - in each case the first part describes the background situation, the middle portion reports words of others (Libyan countrymen of Merey in the first part and Egyptian lords in the second), and the final section summarises Merenptah's response.
So, the overall structure of the Song mirrors that of Merenptah's Israel Stele, while the metrical pattern is closely related to that of Ugaritic poetry from a little earlier. The following model is therefore suggested for the origins and development of this Song: